This makes me really happy. Perfectly and reliably and without fuss, shares all my iTunes stuff to my XBox 360. Neato!
Trial also available. Connect360
Originally published Dec 24th, 2010 9:00pm.
(None of these happened. As it turns out, Apple is far more interested in things like ‘Launchpad’ (a grid of icons. No, really.) than having middleclick, cut and paste, or proper mouse movement. Silly me!)

1. Native middle-click for Magic Mouse (3rd party fix – try MagicDriver).
2. Adjustable mouse acceleration (3rd party fix, MagicDriver, see above).
3. Cut and paste in Finder (3rd party fix – try TotalFinder).
4. More awesomeness. ‘Cause I mean really. Is there such thing as enough? (No).
(Originally published Feb 4th, 2010 10:04pm).
(For the record, I was indeed wrong about the ‘hit and miss’, and now own and enjoy an iPad 2. I think many of the points raised by people like Mr. Chen are still quite valid).
This started out as a little comment on Gizmodo but as I wrote it it became longer.


So we’ve gotten over the sanitary napkin jokes, the kneejerk reactions, and people are looking at this iPad thing. First, let me say, no Apple didn’t invent the tablet. But to be honest, outside of data collection and cartooning/graphics, what use is there for the standard Windows Tablet?
However, I really don’t think there’s much use for Apple’s one either.
Personally I feel Apple has a hit and miss on this one. Then again, I thought that about the original iPhone. I guess that’s why I’m not a stock analyst.
All I can see is Steve Jobs sitting in his office, and saying ‘Hmm… everyone thinks we should make a tablet. I guess if we do, most of these people will buy one. Let’s try something to test the waters, make a big circus act about it, and see what happens. If noone likes it, we’ll call it ‘niche’ like the Apple TV‘.
Jason Chen of Gizmodo wrote a brilliant article about ‘The Two Wrong Ways to Make a Tablet‘. In it, he describes the two wrong ways as being Microsoft’s way to date (make a desktop smaller) and Apple’s (make a phone bigger).
He then outlines that neither of these are good enough. There needs to be a third approach.
I really agree with the ‘third approach’. I haven’t seen a huge amount on the courier, but I definitely agree about the concept of ‘everything talking to everything else’. Which, when you think about it, is the opposite of the iPhone environment.
Separated apps work great on a phone. But it’s a phone. You take it out, tap the screen, any emails? No, any tweets? Yes, reply, check weather, back in pocket.
Come on, seriously, is that how anyone’s going to use a tablet? Where will you get a pocket that big?
Think of Star Trek. Remember the pads they had? (Acronym PADD, Personal Access Display Device). Everything’s accessible on it, everything interconnects, you don’t open the ‘sensor’ app and then the ‘diagnostic’ app, then email the text from that to the ‘communications’ app. You pick it up, open some info, run a diagnostic, and transmit it.
Strangely enough this is the kind of thing Mr. Ive and Mr. Jobs spout… and then they bring out a device that does the opposite, compartmentalise each and every task.
I guess that’s Reality Distortion at work.








